EUROPEAN CUSTOMS: A NEW LOOK

Last week the EU’s Official Journal published the text of Council Regulation 1383/2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights. Coming into effect on 1 July 2004, the new Regulation repeals the existing provision under Regulation 3295/94. This is what the new Regulation does:

1. It sets out the conditions under which customs authorities can act when they encounter goods they suspect of infringing IP rights whether they are entering or leaving EU territory or being released for free circulation there.

2. It provides definitions of “counterfeit” and “pirated” goods.

3. It enables the customs authorities to suspend the free movement of suspected infringing goods both where they have been notified of those goods by IP owners and where they need to detain the goods till they can contact the IP owners and ascertain if the goods are lawful or not.

4. It provides a procedure for the destruction of counterfeit and pirate goods without the need to institute formal legal proceedings to determine that those goods infringe an IP right under local law.

5. It exempts certain infringing goods which enter the EU as part of an individual’s duty-free allowance.

Read here what the TRIPs Agreement has to say about border controls against infringing IP imports
Find out here why importing fakes is a mug’s game
Are your Beatles memorabilia fake? Check here
Tell real shrunken heads from the fake variety here


EUROPEAN CUSTOMS: A NEW LOOK <strong>EUROPEAN CUSTOMS: A NEW LOOK</strong> Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, August 08, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.