IT PAYS NOT TO MESS WITH LIBRARIANS

The Library Journal reports that the American Library Association is contemplating dropping its lawyers, Jenner & Block, on conflict of interest grounds because the law firm has represented RIAA, the recording industry interest group, in its attempts to gather the names of illegal music downloaders. The ALA prides itself on championing “equity of access” and “intellectual freedom,” saying on its website:

“Intellectual Freedom is the right of every individual to both seek and receive information from all points of view without restriction. It provides for free access to all expressions of ideas through which any and all sides of a question, cause or movement may be explored. Intellectual freedom encompasses the freedom to hold, receive and disseminate ideas. It is a core value of the library profession and a cornerstone of democracy.”

The IPKat notes that the beauty of a free and competitive market is that clients are able to align themselves with a law firm that reflects their attitudes and dissociate themselves from their lawyers when they find that their ways of thinking do not match. This also goes to show that a firm’s valued clients can act as a check on activities which those clients regard as being less desirable.

Librarians like you’ve never seen them before here, here and here!
What to buy the librarian in your life here
Learn about the Dewey Decimal system here
Useless fact of the day: Batgirl was a librarian


IT PAYS NOT TO MESS WITH LIBRARIANS IT PAYS NOT TO MESS WITH LIBRARIANS Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, September 05, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.