BAYONNE BLEEDER SUES -- BUT DOES HIS LAWSUIT PACK A PUNCH?

Findlaw reports that former heavyweight boxer Chuck Wepner is suing actor Sylvester Stallone for a share of the profits from the "Rocky" movies, claiming the series was based on Wepner's career. Wepner, a New Jersey club fighter, acquired the nickname "The Bayonne Bleeder" for what his opponents did to him even when he won. Wepner, who went nearly 15 rounds in a 1975 loss to Muhammad Ali, has filed a claim before a Jersey City Superior Court that Stallone repeatedly credited that fight as the inspiration for the 1976 Oscar-winning film, from which four sequels followed. "Stallone has been using Chuck's name - and continues to this day - in promoting the `Rocky' franchise without any permission or compensation", said Wepner's lawyer Anthony Mango. Michelle Vega, Stallone's publicist, declined to comment. The lawsuit claims Stallone made several promises to Wepner that he would be financially compensated over the years, though no payments were made.

The IPKat wonders what the legal basis for this claim might be. Stallone and the film’s makers are not alleged to have infringed any trade mark or copyright and, in the absence of any contractual duty to compensate Wepner, a mere promise to do so is not enforceable. Nor is it clear that any right of publicity has been infringed since, even if he was inspired by Wepner, Rocky is very much his own fictional character.

Rocky movies and merchandise
Bleeding boxers here and here
Other boxers here, here and here


BAYONNE BLEEDER SUES -- BUT DOES HIS LAWSUIT PACK A PUNCH? BAYONNE BLEEDER SUES  --  BUT DOES HIS LAWSUIT PACK A PUNCH? Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, November 14, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.