The IPKat paid a visit to St Peter's College Oxford's IP Research Centre this evening to hear Mr Justice Pumfrey address an enraptured audience on EU jurisprudence on the registrability of product shapes as trade marks. He particularly highlighted the recent tendency for objections to product shape applications to be lodged under Article 3(1)(b) of Directive 89/104, rather than Article 3(1)(e). Article 3(1)(b) bars the registration of signs which are devoid of distinctive character, while Article 3(1)(e) lists grounds specifically addresses to the unregistrability of shape marks (including functionality). He also identified the beginnings in ECJ judgments of an attitude that certain objections under Article 3(1)(b) cannot be overcome by the applicant showing acquired distinctiveness under Article 3(3).

The IPKat is intrigued by Mr Justice Pumfrey's approach. The Directive makes no mention of a special class of Article 3(1)(b) signs that cannot be saved from being unregistrable through acquired distinctiveness. He waits to see if the ECJ will in fact recognise such signs.
Exotic shapes here and here
The shape of things to come: click here

EU TRADE MARK LAW TAKES SHAPE EU TRADE MARK LAW TAKES SHAPE Reviewed by Jeremy and Ilanah on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.