BUDDHA'S SNOT OUTRAGE: MARK UNREGISTRABLE BUT STILL IN USE

The Telegraph reports that priests at one of Japan's most famous temples have taken steps to block the sale of a sweet marketed as the "Snot from the nose of the Great Buddha". They have prevented the name being registered as a trade mark office, but have been unable to stop vendors selling the sweets to hordes of tourists who flock to see the giant Buddha in the ancient capital, Nara, in western Japan. Yamamoto Bussan, the company that launched the sweet three years ago, has said that in a recession a product name needs to make a strong impact. A spokesman said some employees had doubts about the name, so it was decided to attach the ultra-polite suffix sama to Buddha's name. But the sweet's packaging shows an irreverent picture of Buddha picking his nose.
Local media have suggested that the sweet is popular because the people of western Japan have an earthy sense of humour, which other Japanese often find coarse. Another famous Nara sweet is called "Deer Droppings". Most Japanese do not adhere strongly to any single set of religious beliefs, typically marrying in Christian services, holding Buddhist funerals and attending festivals at Shinto shrines. Buddhists objecting to the sweet on the grounds of profanity seem to be outnumbered by Japanese who are not put off by the thought of eating something named after snot.

The IPKat notes that national trade mark regimes can prevent the registration of unsavoury or offensive marks, but not their use. Recently his masters drafted an article (not yet published) on how to deal with “no-marks” (marks that, given their offensive nature, should be neither registered nor used). If you’d like to read the draft, click here.

Snot here, here, here, here and here
Deer droppings here, here and here
BUDDHA'S SNOT OUTRAGE: MARK UNREGISTRABLE BUT STILL IN USE BUDDHA'S SNOT OUTRAGE: MARK UNREGISTRABLE BUT STILL IN USE Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, May 14, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.