WORTH CONSIDERING?

Now here's something worth taking a look at: LexisNexis is running its Trade Marks 2004 conference in London on Tuesday 30 November. From the programme it looks like an action-packed event. Allan Poulter (Field Fisher Waterhouse) is tackling non-traditional trade marks; Chris Durrant (Arsenal's client partner at Lawrence Jones) addresses trade mark infringement and the Arsenal v Reed saga; Morag Macdonald (Bird & Bird) takes a look at distinctiveness -- and there's lots more besides.

Not having been to a LexisNexis conference before, the IPKat is looking forward to trying it out. See you there?
WORTH CONSIDERING? WORTH CONSIDERING? Reviewed by Jeremy on Saturday, October 23, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.