LATEST EIPR

The November 2004 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's monthly journal European Intellectual Property Review has now been published. It contains, among other items, the following pieces that caught the IPKat's eye:

* "Anti-competitive Refusals to Grant Copyright Licences: Reflections on the IMS Saga" by National University of Singapore Assistant Professor Burton Ong (links to the European Court of Justice's IMS cases here);

* A case comment by John Hull (Denton Wilde Sapte) on the curious no-right-of-reply case of Tillery Valley Foods Ltd v Channel 4;

* "Cherry Picking in Cross-border Patent Infringement Actions: a Comparative Overview of German and UK Procedure and Practice" by Jan Klink (Edwards Geldard).
LATEST EIPR LATEST EIPR Reviewed by Jeremy on Saturday, November 13, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.