WHEN IT COMES TO THE CRUNCH ...


Findlaw reports that cereal maker Kellogg Co. is suing to prevent competitor General Mills Inc., which for nearly 20 years has made "Cinnamon Toast Crunch" cereal, from registering the phrase "Cinnamon Toast Crunch" as a trade mark for use with a cereal-based food bar. In a federal lawsuit, Kellogg says it has long used "cinnamon toast", or a similar descriptive phrase, in connection with the same categories of food products as General Mills, including cereals and waffles.
Kellogg could be damaged if General Mills is granted the trade mark, the suit claims. Kellogg seeks a rejection of the trade mark application as well as unspecified damages from its competitor.

Minneapolis-based General Mills, which first applied for the trade mark in 2000, declined to comment on the lawsuit. But spokeswoman Marybeth Thorsgaard noted that a ruling earlier this year by a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office appeal board rejected Kellogg's claims, saying the company
"had not produced evidence showing that it had a commercial interest in the term 'cinnamon toast'".
The IPKat, left to his own imagination, would have assumed that 'cinnamon toast crunch' was a pretty descriptive sort of term for anything that tasted of cinnamon, had the texture of toast and crunched when you bit it. Also, it's a pretty deceptive term for anything that isn't. His feline friend Merpel reminds him that the breakfast cereal industry is famed for its devotion to descriptive terms, cornflakes being a good example of a trade mark that bit the dust for becoming generic.

Cinnamon toast crunch cocktail here
Cinnamon crunch French toast here
Scientific basis of toast crumb adhesion here
WHEN IT COMES TO THE CRUNCH ... WHEN IT COMES TO THE CRUNCH ... Reviewed by Jeremy on Saturday, November 20, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.