For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Friday, 3 June 2005

EPO ROUND-UP: PART 1

Last week, the IPKat sought the thoughts of his readers regarding reporting EPO decisions. Well, one of his readers, Darren Smyth, gave the IPKat not only his thoughts, but also a breakdown of important decisions during the month of May. There's so many that the IPKat has decided to report them in three installments. Here's the first, consisting of reports from the EPO Board of Appeal reported in the Official Journal during May - look out for the next one during the coming week:

T1110/03

This decision is primarily about whether post published documents can be taken as evidence of the state of the art before the priority date of the patent. However, I find it more interesting because it confirms the view of T1122/01 that presentations of the Power Point type are probably not appropriate during oral proceedings, because they change the character of oral proceedings from an oral character to a written character. However, the decision does not go so far as to say that such presentations can never be allowed. However, it will probably be necessary at the least that the content of the proposed presentation is submitted to the EPO and to the parties at least by the deadline for final written submissions.

T1181/04

This interesting decision appears to consider that the present EPO grant-stage practice under Rule 51(4) EPC is unlawful. The amendment to Rule 51 in 2002 was stated in the notice published at OJ EPO 2002,112 to include the change that express disapproval of the proposed text for grant is “no longer foreseen”. However, the Board of Appeal states that “this practice is not justified by the EPC for the reasons set out below”. It is further stated “present Rule 51 EPC does not provide any way to express disapproval. But this does not mean that the applicant can be deprived of the possibility of expressing its disapproval.” It would appear that the Board of Appeal is suggesting either that the Rule itself be changed, or that the wording of the Communication under Rule 51(4) be changed.

T1255/04

This decision states that, in a case where there is a request considered allowable on which a Rule 51(4) EPC Communication is to be sent, but there are also not allowed higher-ranking requests, the Communication under Rule 51(4) EPC is deficient if it is not accompanied by reasons why the higher-ranking requests are not allowed. This Communication should also expressly mention the option of maintaining the disallowed requests, thus reminding the applicant and the Examining Division of the possibility for the applicant of asking for a written appealable decision on these higher-ranking requests.

The EPO - home of happy patent examiners
The IPKat says, thanks Darren.

9 comments:

Marketing man said...

You have a nice blog here! I will be sure to book mark you.
I have a direct opt in email marketing site. It pretty much covers direct opt in email marketing related stuff. Check it out if you get time :-)

Quit Smoking said...

Hello fellow fisherman,

Did you know that 16% of the U.S. population goes fishing at least 16 days a year?

Did you also know that over 75% of the nations fishermen do not fish during "prime time"; fish feeding hours?

Those precious few moments before twilight can be absolutely magical. Even up until 11pm at night, the largest predators of any species feed ravenously.

Don't believe me? Check out Daniel Eggertsen's story, and a picture of a couple of his catches here : "Evening Secrets plus more"

I want you to do me a favor and try it out so I can see what you think of it, and if it works for you as well as it did for me.

You will be one of the first to try it out.

Gone Fishin',

Neil

Turnkey Builder said...

Market oi millions with blogblastermarketing managementmarketing management
Please go to http://ww.blog-masters.net

Brian said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a mortgage marketing site/blog. It pretty much covers mortgage marketing related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Brian said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a list mailing porn site/blog. It pretty much covers list mailing porn related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Anonymous said...

Yo, This blog is pretty neat. You should check out mine sometime. It pretty much covers make big money from home related stuff.

Brian said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a yellow page advertising agency site/blog. It pretty much covers yellow page advertising agency related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Brian said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a education list mailing site/blog. It pretty much covers education list mailing related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Dotmotor said...

I find your thoughts very interesting. Perhaps your readers might find targeted bulk email marketing interesting.

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':