PICKING WINNERS? GET A PATENT


This Indian delicacy came to the IPKat's attention today, from the Economic Times. The Delhi District Court has been asked to stay the preliminary round for choosing participants for the Kaun Banega Crorepati-2 TV game show, hosted by Amitabh Bachchan, by four Mumbai-based claimants who are asserting patent rights over the selection process adopted by Star India. That company, counterclaiming for the patent's cancellation, maintains that the claimants' patent was fraudulently obtained and that it had in any event been anticipated by earlier foreign patents. As the District Court has no jurisdiction to determine the validity of a patent, this matter has been referred to the Delhi High Court.

Amitabh Bachchan: hosting an infringing programme?

The IPKat hopes to learn more about this litigation. He recalls Lord Justice Jacob, at this year's Fordham Conference, condemning IP grants that serve no useful industrial or commercial end and wonders whether this one -- which might well be regarded as unpatentable under Article 52 of the European Patent Convention as a way of doing business or playing a game -- would stand up to his Lordship's critical scrutiny.

Kaun Banega Crorepati-2 official website here
PICKING WINNERS? GET A PATENT PICKING WINNERS? GET A PATENT Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, July 04, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.