FIRST CTMS UP FOR RENEWAL


1 April 2006 marks the tenth anniversary of the first Community trade marks to be registered, and that means…renewal fees! OHIM has announced how the renewal process will work. The six month window for requesting renewals of marks with a filing date during April 1996 begins in November 2005 and lasts until 30 April 2006 but OHIM will be sending reminder notices out from September 2005. Those who have filed applications filed in April 1996 have not yet matured to registration (e.g. because of lengthy opposition proceedings) will also have to pay renewal fees, but only at the time when the mark is registered.

Once the mark is registered, those applicants will be requested to pay registration fees and renewal fees to ensure continued registration for the period between the 10th and 20th anniversary of filing. Those who pay the registration fees only and do not pay the renewal fees will have their marks registered, but then will immediately receive a notice saying that the registration has expired.


The IPKat says that there’s no excuse for forgetting to renew your CTM. He’s a bit worried though about the prospect of CTM applications that take ten years to process. He also wonders what the legal status of CTMs which are granted but then immediately expire during the window between registration and expiry.
FIRST CTMS UP FOR RENEWAL FIRST CTMS UP FOR RENEWAL Reviewed by Unknown on Sunday, September 11, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.