US COPYRIGHT ROUND-UP


The IPKat brings copyright news from across the Pond:

* New York Blade reports that DC Comics is threatening copyright action against a New York art dealer and website. Kathleen Cullen of Kathleen Cullen fine arts has exhibited drawing by the artist Mark Chamberlain, which show Batman and his faithful assistant/second fiddle Robin in a variety of homoerotic and semi-nude poses.

The IPKat thinks that this case is a good contender for a fair use parody defence to infringement and, even if it isn’t, the adverse publicity that DC Comics will get out of making threats in such a situation probably outweighs the negative effects that this artwork might have on the image of Batman.


* NBC17 reports that a student of Duke University, North Carolina is bringing an infringement action against a website which sells term papers online, after finding a paper that she wrote online. She is seeking $10,000 compensation for the copying of the paper she wrote while studying abroad as an undergraduate student at Mount Holyoke College. The IPKat thinks there could be some tricky damages issues here. Ordinarily a college paper would not be sold and so would have little commercial value. Here though, the paper is being sold and therefore manifestly has some commercial value. However, one would hope that the student would not license her paper to be copied, since this would amount to helping others to cheat. The IPKat would also like to know where the website got the paper from.
US COPYRIGHT ROUND-UP US COPYRIGHT ROUND-UP Reviewed by Unknown on Friday, September 02, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.