BPI v MCPS


The IPKat has learnt that the MCPS is doing battle with the BPI, AOL, Apple iTunes, MusicNet, Napster, RealNetworks, Sony Connect and Yahoo and various mobile phone operators (02, Orange, T-Mobile and Vodaphone) over the terms of the Joint Online Licence (JOL). The BPI, the digital service providers and the phone operators are arguing that the MCPS should accept a lower percentage of the price paid by downloaders and are challenging the JOL before the copyright tribunal. Currently the rate is 12% but the BPI and the other applicants would like it reduced to 8%. The MCPS rejects this rate, saying that authors of musical works will lose out and the parity in reward between the online world and the physical world will be lost.

The IPKat says that this is a tough one. He’s broadly in favour of rewards that go (relatively) straight to the authors. The only justification he can see for reducing the royalty rate is if consumers get cheaper downloads as a result. Will this happen if the terms of the licence are varied he asks. What's clear though is that, considering the range of digital service providers and mobile phone operators involved, the outcome of the tribunal will have a profound effect on the online and mobile phone music industry in the UK.
BPI v MCPS BPI v MCPS Reviewed by Unknown on Sunday, January 15, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.