THREE HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE


The IPKat noticed the following on the Court Service's listings website


NOTICE
Take notice that on THURSDAY 26 JANUARY, 2006 in COURT 69, at 10 O'CLOCK, Judgment will be given in the following.
APPEAL
From The Chancery Division
FINAL DECISIONS
A3/2004/2448 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV -v- Remington Consumer Products Ltd & anr.
The IPKat believes that this judgment concerns protection of the "clover-leaf" element of Philips' shaver as a trade mark. He hopes to bring you further information on Thursday.
THREE HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE THREE HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE Reviewed by Unknown on Saturday, January 21, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.