FRENCH ONLINE COPYRIGHT BILL: ROUND 2


Businessweek reports that the French Government is trying to push through an amended version of its online copyright bill again. DRMs would get stronger protection, but a panel would oversee the measures to ensure that certain private use exceptions would be maintained. Penalties for internet ‘piracy’ would range between 38 and 150 euros, rather than 300,000 euros as originally proposed. Online sellers of music and films would have to make them available in formats that can be played on all types of devices, rather than just on devices made by a single manufacturer, such as an iPod. However, one of the key amendments called for by the Bill’s opponents has been scrapped. The new draft does not contain provisions for a ‘global licence’, which would have enabled users to pay a small fee of a few euros that would have entitled them to unlimited internet downloads of copyright material.


The IPKat notes that this certainly gives weaker protection to copyright owners and the ‘owners’ of DRM-protected works that the original French proposal, but it still gives strong protection to them while evening out the balance by placing requirements on them that will be of benefit to users.
FRENCH ONLINE COPYRIGHT BILL: ROUND 2 FRENCH ONLINE COPYRIGHT BILL: ROUND 2 Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 08, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.