JAMES JUMPS; REGISTRY ROCKS


No joy for Joyce scholar

Stanford professor Carol Shloss is suing the estate of James Joyce in the US under copyright laws, according to the Contra Costa Times. Shloss, a Joyce scholar, wishes to use copyright material on her Joyce-related website and argues that the Joyce estate has abused copyright in order to prevent her from providing scholarly comment on Joyce and his work. She is also arguing that the trustees of the Joyce estate have destroyed materials in their care.

While the IPKat thinks that it’s highly unfortunate if Joycean papers have been destroyed, he can’t see what copyright law could do to stop this. The copyright defences allow defendants to escape infringement actions, they do not give a positive right to access physical materials which are protected by copyright.


Coming up in the Registry

The IPKat has spotted hearings involving oppositions to the registration of the following marks in the UK Trade Marks Registry:

* Have a Break
* Hotelsrus
* Wheels ‘R’ Us
* Small Claims R Us
* Budweiser

Full hearings diary here
JAMES JUMPS; REGISTRY ROCKS JAMES JUMPS; REGISTRY ROCKS Reviewed by Unknown on Thursday, June 15, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. "The copyright defences allow defendants to escape infringement actions, they do not give a positive right to access physical materials which are protected by copyright."

    Ah yes - but in the UK compare s.296ZE CDPA 88 which provides that where an ETM prevent permitted acts, you can obtain a remedy by issuing a notice of complaint to the Secretary of State who can direct the owner of the copyright work to make it available.

    A weapon (after a fashion) against the digital lockup. Can't wait for someone to have a go under this section!!!

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.