SMALL PRACTICES; SMALL CLAIMS


Reminder: meeting for sole and small IP practitioners

There's a meeting this Wednesday, 7 June, for the informal Sole and Small IP Practitioners group. Details of the programme and of how to get there can be accessed here. If you'd like to come - and you'll certainly be welcome - just email Shireen Smith and let her know.


Small claims processes to cross European borders

Last Friday the UK's Department for Constitutional Affairs issued a statement concerning small claims actions where a consumer in one EU country buys faulty goods in another. Ministers meeting in Luxembourg have agreed a formula for making cross-border claims quicker and cheaper. According to Baroness Cathy Ashton, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department for Constitutional Affairs:
"This is excellent news for anyone who needs to bring a small claim in another EU country. It will help travellers, tourists, workers and businesses alike. The processes will be simple and effective and give people confidence that they can bring their case without a cumbersome procedure". Under the agreed text, claims valued at less than E2,000 and involving cross border issues will be subject to the procedure. Claim and defence forms will be the same in all official European languages and courts will be encouraged to decide claims on paper where possible, with use made of telephone and video conference communications if oral hearings are felt necessary. Parties need not be legally represented if they do not wish to be, and the process for enforcing judgements in other EU states will be made easier".
The IPKat notes how useful this will be for people who buy cheap counterfeits and don't discover that they've been duped till they get home. Ah, says Merpel, but first you have to identify your defendant ...
SMALL PRACTICES; SMALL CLAIMS SMALL PRACTICES; SMALL CLAIMS Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, June 05, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.