|Thinking of Pinckney |
or that fabulous pair of shoes instead?
|A Kat's working shoes|
|Intention to target or ...|
|... Criterion of accessibility?|
Case C-441/13 Pez Edjduk (on which see here) is currently a reference for a preliminary ruling from Austria which seeks clarification on the interpretation of Article 5(3) in the context of a case of alleged online copyright infringement. The question referred by the national court is centred around the (now infamous) notion of ‘intention to target’ … Does that mean that ‘intention to target’ is dead, long live ‘intention to target’?