After last year’s sell-out crowd, Retromark: the Conference returns for another afternoon of trade mark law and practice on Wednesday, 27 March 2019. Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat, supported by a range of speakers, will again be joining forces to probe at some of the most important issues in trade marks today (although we will do our very best not to mention Brexit). We are very pleased that Mr Justice Arnold has agree to be this year’s keynote speaker.
The event will take place at Simmons & Simmons’ London office in Moorgate from 2pm, culminating in drinks and canapés. The preliminary agenda is below and will be updated with additional speaker details in due course.
You can sign up via Eventbrite here. Reserve your space while you can – last year’s event booked up pretty quickly.
Here's the programme:
14:00-14:30 – Registration
14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome, Adrian Smith, Simmons&Simmons partner
14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “It’s ok to use someone else’s name and logo to refer to them, right?" Exploring the boundaries of honest nominative use.
Moderator: Eleonora Rosati
Panellists:
- Mark Cruickshank, Managing IP Counsel, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group
- Dev Gangjee, Associate Professor at the University of Oxford
- Lindsay Lane QC, Barrister at 8 New Square
- Rebecca Pennington, Senior Counsel at Snap, Inc
15:40-16:00 – The Retromark Awards, Darren Meale, S&S partner and Deputy District Judge
16:00-16:30 – Coffee/tea break
16:30-17:15 – Keynote address: Mr Justice Arnold, the High Court of England and Wales
17:15-18:15 – Panel 2 – Drafting, enforcing and attacking trade marks following SkyKick and Fidelis: how should we write, prove use of and scope the boundaries of protection of registrations?
Moderator: Darren Meale
Panellists:
- Richard Goddard, Trade Mark Counsel, BP, and First Vice President of CITMA
- Stuart Baran, Barrister at 3 New Square
- (+2)
18:15-19:30 – Drinks and canapés
Here's a new edition of Retromark ... to catch up with all the (cool) trade mark news!
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Rating:
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
![[Guest post] Can a trademarked mascot drink, smoke, and spray graffiti under the banner of artistic expression?](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgbyaylrzV0_WRCvj7gUUBCmaRpZYmu5l_yll7jWk32LFKedtZU9fXBnkBocu6wOPN1hNdAcmsMEbripjNMCtI5Lr3VCYfbl9_PJqCuO2Rq4biGkULEo_x_t06S-N5vBIFdAAjcR0L4Q1knvR2ZFxU_F7ZtqRmDrWbWhA7dfSvRjdYwbSx_6oSPvQ/s72-w121-c-h200/Screenshot%202024-04-17%20at%2012.32.14.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html