IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2021

Back by popular demand, it is time to vote for your favourite intellectual property law books of 2021! Anyone who managed to publish a book during 2021 most certainly deserves an award in any event, given the added pressures and stresses of the pandemic, but alas there can be only one winner (per category), so vote wisely. As always, readers can vote for books in five categories: Patents, Copyright, Trade Mark, Design and all other Intellectual Property topics including cross-overs.

This now annual occasion allows the IPKat community to celebrate and congratulate those who have contributed to the IP literature, of which there were many. A lot of which we had the pleasure of reviewing for the IPKat, see here. You can check out previous winners here.

Vote for your best IP book of 2021 by taking the survey here   

PLEASE, FOR THE LOVE OF IP, only complete the survey once! Although it may be tempting to vote 94 votes for your (own) favourite book, this will be a fruitless endeavour as we will only count your vote once from our side. Thank you for playing nicely.

Only votes for books published in 2021 will count. 

Please provide the editor/author's name and title of the book in your votes.

Voting will close at midnight on 31st January 2022,

winners will be announced thereafter.

Good luck!



IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2021 IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2021 Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher on Friday, January 07, 2022 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.