If you missed last week's posts, it's not too late to catch up.
Benjamin Goh discussed the decision in T-346/21 issued by the General Court on 11 January 2023. The General Court upheld a decision that a trade mark was not to be revoked as the proprietor had proved genuine use.
Marcel Pemsel examined the judgment in T-372/21 issued by the General Court on 8 March 2023. The case deals with the question whether a graphic stylisation of a word mark influences its distinctive character.
Copyright
Chijioke Okorie reported that Nigeria amended its Copyright Act to ratify outstanding copyright treaties. The Copyright Act 2022 is aimed inter alia at protecting the rights of authors and providing appropriate limitations and exceptions to guarantee access to creative works. |
| An attentive Kat |
Trade marks and GIs
Anastasiia Kyrylenko reviewed a recent decision issued by the Italian Supreme Court. This case saw the Consortium of producers of protected designation of origin (PDO) “Pecorino Romano” acting against Formaggi Boccea, an Italian cheese producer, which owns “Cacio Romano” trade mark.Benjamin Goh discussed the decision in T-346/21 issued by the General Court on 11 January 2023. The General Court upheld a decision that a trade mark was not to be revoked as the proprietor had proved genuine use.
Marcel Pemsel examined the judgment in T-372/21 issued by the General Court on 8 March 2023. The case deals with the question whether a graphic stylisation of a word mark influences its distinctive character.
Patents
Rose Hugues commented on the decision in G 2/21 issued by the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) on 23 March 2023. The decision concerned the question of post-published evidence.
Never too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Wednesday, March 29, 2023
Rating:
Reviewed by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Wednesday, March 29, 2023
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html