tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post112358748948761112..comments2024-03-28T09:05:22.006+00:00Comments on The IPKat: OH FOR A GOOD AMBUSH!Verónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1131174002493882692005-11-05T07:00:00.000+00:002005-11-05T07:00:00.000+00:00GROW IT YOURSELF!GROW IT YOURSELF!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1130280842667033462005-10-25T23:54:00.000+01:002005-10-25T23:54:00.000+01:00Market oi millions with blogblastersales marketing...Market oi millions with blogblastersales marketingsales marketing<BR/>Please go to http://ww.blog-masters.netMobile Offershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03087582598620018528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1123604350157886562005-08-09T17:19:00.000+01:002005-08-09T17:19:00.000+01:00Thanks, Guy and John H. There really is a problem...Thanks, Guy and John H. There really is a problem here and the "victims" include not just consumers but also fairly substantial trading companies. I'd like to know what WIPO's position on ambush marketing is; they don't seem to have identified it as a big problem, do they? And WTO should be all in favour of it ...Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1123600259822738712005-08-09T16:10:00.000+01:002005-08-09T16:10:00.000+01:00I don't see what you're worried about. The first w...I don't see what you're worried about. The first words in the bill as published are Tessa Jowell's assurance that "In my view the provisions of the London Olympics Bill are compatible with the Convention rights" under the Human Rights Act 1998. What more reassurance could we want? :-/<BR/><BR/>Interested to read s.17(4):<BR/><BR/><I>(4) The regulations may apply in respect of advertising of any kind including, in<BR/>particular—<BR/>(a) advertising of a non-commercial nature, and<BR/>(b) announcements or notices of any kind.</I><BR/><BR/>Which will presumbably catch churches using the Olympics as an opportunity for evangelistic campaigns. So we can look forward to disputes about religious freedom issues, as well as all the other problems this legislation will cause.John Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11074559601919298190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1123591062373685572005-08-09T13:37:00.000+01:002005-08-09T13:37:00.000+01:00London 2012 was registered as a UK trade mark over...London 2012 was registered as a UK trade mark over a year ago; optimism. The IOC applied to register London 2012, Paris 2012, etc. even earlier as if you back all the horses in a race you are sure to back a winner. The Olympic sign is a protected mark. Why do we need new legislation?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com