tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post113404002910904717..comments2024-03-28T11:16:43.146+00:00Comments on The IPKat: THE IPKAT PRESENTS...KITTY LITTERVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1134121938487108792005-12-09T09:52:00.000+00:002005-12-09T09:52:00.000+00:00Richard McD Bridge's comment is posted by "rogerth...Richard McD Bridge's comment is posted by "rogerthechorister". Isn't that unlawful too, or is the government issuing licences ...?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1134057896319568762005-12-08T16:04:00.000+00:002005-12-08T16:04:00.000+00:00This is nothing to do with carol singers, as the e...This is nothing to do with carol singers, as the entertainment licence link makes plain. This is a plain copyright issue.<BR/><BR/>As to the IP Dog's assertion, the CZJ/Douglas cover pic remains on the blog unless the IP Dog can persuade the IPKat that, on the current state of UK law, the link is indeed a fresh intrusion on the couple's privacy, which the IPKat strenuously denies.Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1134044679008287262005-12-08T12:24:00.000+00:002005-12-08T12:24:00.000+00:00I noticed that too, but I assumed that the licence...I noticed that too, but I assumed that the licence she was talking about was for public entertainment on the streets, not copyright. I applaud the idea of posting these misunderstandings as they are many and disturbing. You can find a few old chestnuts at the moment at <A>http://www.filemot.com/Research.htm</A>. Copyright suffers a lot but I think there is also a lot of scope for a better understanding of what the patent system is for Ian Karet and David Rosenberg brought out during the JIPLP launch.Filemothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15735898485265104580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1134043297840339482005-12-08T12:01:00.000+00:002005-12-08T12:01:00.000+00:00I think the IPKat is being a bit oversensitive abo...I think the IPKat is being a bit oversensitive about the use of the word 'licence'. Anne was not referring to licence of the copyright, but of a licence to provide entertainment, as required by the government <A HREF="http://www.culture.gov.uk/alcohol_and_entertainment/licensing_act_2003/regulated_entertainment.htm#12" REL="nofollow">http://www.culture.gov.uk/alcohol_and_entertainment/licensing_act_2003/regulated_entertainment.htm#12</A><BR/><BR/>Obviously, this still only applies to premises and not to carol singers - but maybe she was being a bit tongue in cheek!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com