tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post1147702199090501628..comments2024-03-19T12:09:41.188+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Breaking news: Court of Justice rules on sale and use of AdWordsVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-90369913675715608702010-03-23T16:25:08.347+00:002010-03-23T16:25:08.347+00:00Excellent. The only little down side in my opion i...Excellent. The only little down side in my opion is that the ECJ (aka "CJ") missed the opportunity to establish (Europe-wide) that search engines should receive a liability exception...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-42724411655204940392010-03-23T10:16:29.897+00:002010-03-23T10:16:29.897+00:00Nice outcome. Google not liable for infringement,...Nice outcome. Google not liable for infringement, users are.<br /><br />Ergo, Google change the procedure to take down UK ads to delete the requirement for tm to be in the ad, and then bring in the ability to object to the "takedown" request.<br /><br />I think YouTube will probably worry about the finding on Article 14.Aaronhttp://www.woodtmd.comnoreply@blogger.com