tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post1497317001947957974..comments2024-03-19T08:36:55.274+00:00Comments on The IPKat: UK customs procedures and the burden of proofVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-41356801844745977202009-06-25T09:13:47.727+01:002009-06-25T09:13:47.727+01:00In abstract terms this seems fair; the burden of p...In abstract terms this seems fair; the burden of proof should rest on the party trying to prevent free movement of goods, not enable it. But is this going to lead to a significant increase in the workload of the courts? <br /><br />Without knowing how often HMRC detain allegedly infringing goods it's hard to form a picture of the scale of this issue; does anyone have a rough idea of how frequently this happens?Simon Bradshawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14233721281522686341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-29130345602526971362009-06-25T08:41:09.953+01:002009-06-25T08:41:09.953+01:00So.. it sounds like if you have a notification sti...So.. it sounds like if you have a notification still in the initial 10 day period then you should make sure you do the witness statement now, as if you delay and get an extension of 10 days then you will fall into the new system.Aaron Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09187055280399284814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-29203305345174023742009-06-25T07:34:35.345+01:002009-06-25T07:34:35.345+01:00Most spell checking systems will try and convert &...Most spell checking systems will try and convert "trade mark" to "trademark".<br />Most users of these systems bow to their commands.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-81435108548406336992009-06-24T15:59:06.603+01:002009-06-24T15:59:06.603+01:00"Trade mark" as "trademark"? ..."Trade mark" as "trademark"? Come, join the dark side of the Force.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com