tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post2423964289917656611..comments2024-03-29T12:23:31.959+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Coexistence agreementsVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-90241617705187044462007-12-12T08:28:00.000+00:002007-12-12T08:28:00.000+00:00Apple or Beatles? I'm sure you are having a little...Apple or Beatles? I'm sure you are having a little jest at their expense. Likewise WWF and WWF, and Prudential and Prudential. These are perfect examples of "how not to do it".Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-67583807212483711112007-12-12T04:38:00.000+00:002007-12-12T04:38:00.000+00:00Co-existence agreements have been the subject of s...Co-existence agreements have been the subject of some controversy in Australia following the decision of Heerey J in Cadbury Schweppes and Darrell Lea Chocolates, where Heerey J took into account the evidence of co-existence agreements Cadbury Schweppes entered into when finding that Cadbury Schweppes had inconsistently enforced its (unregistered) rights in the colour purple.<BR/><BR/>His Honour's decision was overturned by the full Federal Court, but from memory the full Court didn't have much to say about his Honour's comments on the co-existence agreements.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12012695878998990178noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-76443610871308079092007-12-11T22:10:00.000+00:002007-12-11T22:10:00.000+00:00Perhaps you could email Apple or the Beatles lawye...Perhaps you could email Apple or the Beatles lawyers?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com