tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post270554808736610458..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Researchers: are they workers?Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-43244597030684282992008-07-25T07:37:00.000+01:002008-07-25T07:37:00.000+01:00Partners' wives: employed by the firm, but "worker...Partners' wives: employed by the firm, but "workers"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-13347932433273258072008-07-24T18:31:00.000+01:002008-07-24T18:31:00.000+01:00and if, in return for those activities, he receive...<I>and if, in return for those activities, he receives remuneration.</I><BR/><BR/>I wonder whether the possibility of future royalties might not be considered remuneration. A contract executory?Michael F. Martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15279501532684851571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-19100879808344635782008-07-24T18:10:00.000+01:002008-07-24T18:10:00.000+01:00Merpel is right, there is a fundamental distinctio...Merpel is right, there is a fundamental distinction between an employee and a worker - and once you start to look at the English cases about the "control" test for employees the idea that a "worker" must work under the direction of the institute or fail to be a worker has dangerous ramifications.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com