tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post3340899538207390511..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: CJEU rules that broadcasting music on a plane or train is a communication to the public, but installing relevant equipment isn’tVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-31078467907975488732023-04-27T11:48:01.154+01:002023-04-27T11:48:01.154+01:00Thanks for your comment - in STIM and Sami it was ...Thanks for your comment - in STIM and Sami it was indeed found that Recital 27 would apply because the equipment had been installed by the car manufacturers, not the rental car providersEleonora Rosatihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-30406084110580628892023-04-25T16:34:32.866+01:002023-04-25T16:34:32.866+01:00Brilliant post, as always. It certainly paves the ...Brilliant post, as always. It certainly paves the way for a new understanding of communication to the public in the transports sector. However, I wonder if the comment in Stim and SAMI is fully accurate, since the ruling seems to declare that there is not such a communication to the public.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com