tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post4140264812068813047..comments2024-03-19T10:15:37.338+00:00Comments on The IPKat: The moose, loose in the non-use hooseVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-85796144426723624072014-04-14T15:30:33.758+01:002014-04-14T15:30:33.758+01:00The scene in the picture makes me think about a Ge...The scene in the picture makes me think about a Georges Harrison song.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-55116871044135719822014-04-12T13:29:56.890+01:002014-04-12T13:29:56.890+01:00Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the loophol...Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the loophole I am not sure I am comfortable with OHIM depriving proprietors of their lawful rights in this way, and thus effectively taking the side of the cancellation applicant. If OHIM thinks the law is wrong, its proper course is to lobby for change, not act to frustrate the expressed will of the Member States.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-84270277344294255552014-04-11T16:23:14.439+01:002014-04-11T16:23:14.439+01:00This new practice of OHIM to suspend the recordal ...This new practice of OHIM to suspend the recordal of a surrender of a CTM while a cancellation action is pending against that CTM actually has no basis in the CTMR, however... And note, it also applies to invalidity cancellation actions, not just non-use cancellation actions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com