tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post4219044810755820463..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: And We Wonder Why We're Fat: Patents in the American Kitchen (And Claim Limitation Law)Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-89887602152248485882012-06-19T22:43:14.012+01:002012-06-19T22:43:14.012+01:00This Kat apologizes if she misread her readers - s...This Kat apologizes if she misread her readers - she did not intend to lament the patentability of cellulose dough. She intended to lament its existence.Tara Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17691748438376846482noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-83350462516309961752012-06-19T15:11:19.296+01:002012-06-19T15:11:19.296+01:00Lazy blogging. Unless you are suggesting that US ...Lazy blogging. Unless you are suggesting that US domestic toasters have heating elements that heating elements that heat to between 2500 F. and 4500 F. or that home cooks were already making sandwiches having crimped edges then I think US home cooks have little to fear. I wonder, did you in fact read the claims of these patents before writing this piece?<br /><br />You also fail to articulate any specific reasons why food products and related equipment should be unpatentable, though clearly you believe they should be unpatentable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com