tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post4286263550655443443..comments2024-03-18T17:10:35.838+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Congress 1, Public 0, Part 2: The Dissent in Golan v. HolderVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-77151303103604548922012-01-29T22:56:42.934+00:002012-01-29T22:56:42.934+00:00I know you've told us about discussions, but l...I know you've told us about discussions, but lack of the conversation about it in common-public like me seems to me more astounding.Jackhttp://jackbewildered.com/2012/01/27/impartial-legal-analysis-about-golan-v-holder/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-32763607684128900122012-01-27T12:10:20.418+00:002012-01-27T12:10:20.418+00:00Tara
Very nice job on setting out the position of...Tara<br /><br />Very nice job on setting out the position of the dissenters. Based on your summary, it seems to me that they actually got the better of the argument. Whatever one's view about this case, one thing is for sure: U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on copyright can be so idiosyncratic!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com