tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post4435887512704792487..comments2024-03-29T11:10:02.290+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Gama v Pal: court disposes of wet wipe applicationVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-45790087504374124002015-07-28T12:03:29.040+01:002015-07-28T12:03:29.040+01:00Michael -- just to clarify: the reference to the p...Michael -- just to clarify: the reference to the packaging rather than to the wipes themselves isn't my invention; it's mentioned explicitly in the Lawtel note. Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-82085410457550849312015-07-28T11:09:24.332+01:002015-07-28T11:09:24.332+01:00Jeremy,
I think the problem is that you are looki...Jeremy,<br /><br />I think the problem is that you are looking at the packaging. Clearly the correct perspective is the look and feel of the wipes themselves and the likelihood of confusion they cause.<br /><br />Apart from industrial wipes for removing solvents, it is very difficult to tell them apart merely by wiping.<br /><br />Surely the test is whether a black cat using the wipe in a coal cellar would know the difference.Michael Factorhttp://blog.ipfactor.co.ilnoreply@blogger.com