tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post4900046610951766669..comments2024-03-29T11:10:02.290+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Use of "trademark.com" domain names for criticism sitesVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-77226263761510181542009-07-28T22:26:39.174+01:002009-07-28T22:26:39.174+01:00A noncommercial criticism site would more logicall...A noncommercial criticism site would more logically be found in a .org or .info domain than a .com.Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17724373978066396316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-19670877357549857362009-07-28T12:11:50.762+01:002009-07-28T12:11:50.762+01:00Matthew has correctly shed light on the difference...Matthew has correctly shed light on the difference of approach between US and European thinking. I thought that this divergence was behind the panelist's express reliance (for the free speech discussion) on the fact that both entities were US based.Nikos Prentoulishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12765171039389801999noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-61834854298876960902009-07-28T00:26:43.779+01:002009-07-28T00:26:43.779+01:00One complication with the so-called European appro...One complication with the so-called European approach is para. 172 of The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues –Final Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, April 30, 1999 which explains that para 4(c)(iii) of the UDRP is intended to reflect:<br /><br /><i> “Domain name registrations that are justified by legitimate free speech rights or by legitimate non-commercial considerations would likewise not be considered to be abusive.”</i>iWarwickhttp://ipwars.comnoreply@blogger.com