tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post5278491387092986689..comments2024-03-28T13:45:42.289+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Monday musingsVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-11377929446795681332009-07-13T11:01:28.395+01:002009-07-13T11:01:28.395+01:00Of course intellectual property is part of busines...Of course intellectual property is part of business law! Therefore, in principle, business law texts should cover IP, probably focussing on the transactional side.<br /><br />Commercial lawyers and transactional IP lawyers work in the same area, often in a single department.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-8034050542577348732009-07-13T07:16:20.573+01:002009-07-13T07:16:20.573+01:00Regarding the Google public domain search: such a ...Regarding the Google public domain search: such a system works only if spurious claims to copyright are not made by publishers. Otherwise, how are Google able to distinguish such images? <br /><br />For example, publications which reproduce substantial portions of, say, the plays of William Shakespeare still bear text asserting that "no part of this publication may be...reproduced...without prior permission of the author", which is, on the face of it, untrue.<br /><br />I wandered across the following paper on just this subject recently: is the Kat aware?<br /><br />http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com