tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post5541665612992209440..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: This bunny (litigation) never diesVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-8650178058792910752010-07-21T10:47:16.814+01:002010-07-21T10:47:16.814+01:00I'd say the Riegelein bunny looks more crafty ...I'd say the Riegelein bunny looks more crafty than cheerful, as if he may have left a few chocolate drops in the house of the Lindt bunny.Arthur Sleepnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-86425278904836445372010-07-20T17:12:54.305+01:002010-07-20T17:12:54.305+01:00it's not the BGH, it's the OLG Frankfurt t...it's not the BGH, it's the OLG Frankfurt that makes observations on the cheerfulness of the bunnies in its decision of 8 November 2007, Az. 6 U 10/03, para. 28. The exact quote is:<br /><br />"Nicht zuletzt verleiht das aufgemalte Gesicht des Y-Hasen mit dem geöffneten Mund und den sichtbaren Zähnen diesem einen eher fröhlichen Charakter, während der X-GOLDHASE eher zurückhaltend, edel gezeichnet ist."<br /><br />Decision here:<br />http://www.lareda.hessenrecht.hessen.de/jportal/portal/page/bslaredaprod.psml?pid=Dokumentanzeige&showdoccase=1&js_peid=Trefferliste&fromdoctodoc=yes&doc.id=JURE080009602%3Ajuris-r01&doc.part=L&doc.price=0.0Mark Schweizerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04460433294632554129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-61623420778342314022010-07-20T14:11:33.140+01:002010-07-20T14:11:33.140+01:00Sorry, dear IPKAT help me, where does the Bundesge...Sorry, dear IPKAT help me, where does the Bundesgerichthof say "facial expression of Riegelein's bunny was "cheerful", while Lindt's bunny was "dignified"". I can't find it? ThankyouAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-20349311422337390202010-07-19T18:42:53.722+01:002010-07-19T18:42:53.722+01:00We should perhaps consider introducing claims to d...We should perhaps consider introducing claims to define trademark subject-matter, deciding infringement would then be soooo much easier. Lemme see...<br /><br />1. A chocolate bunny comprising a chocolate edible means shaped in a form selected from the group comprising bunnies, rabbits, hares, or operably reminiscent of a small mammal of the Leporidae order; an aluminium wrapper, the wrapper being at least wrapped around the chocolate edible article; ribbon means substantially knotted about the neck of wrapped edible chocolate article, characterised in that the wrapper presents a dignified look motive.<br /><br />Instead of PSA, originality could be judged using a reverse giggle test.<br /><br />I think I'll stick to patents when I that some things could be worse. ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-56456063483155168492010-07-19T15:47:49.266+01:002010-07-19T15:47:49.266+01:00the full grounds for the decision are not yet avai...the full grounds for the decision are not yet available, usually takes 2-3 months from the date of the decision for them to be posted. Case reference is I ZR 57/08.Mark Schweizerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04460433294632554129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-43856226505306160052010-07-19T15:39:41.299+01:002010-07-19T15:39:41.299+01:00Please can you post a link to the full decision an...Please can you post a link to the full decision and the case reference?Bunnynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-50597449662314962082010-07-19T13:28:03.230+01:002010-07-19T13:28:03.230+01:00at it like bunnies thenat it like bunnies thenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com