tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post6105836906498919011..comments2024-03-29T11:10:02.290+00:00Comments on The IPKat: DeepMind: First major AI patent filings revealedVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-54289606038398830202018-09-13T22:53:18.853+01:002018-09-13T22:53:18.853+01:00Google has lots of intellectual property issues in...Google has lots of intellectual property issues in recent years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Criticism_of_Google#Intellectual_property_section?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-84311207798516825162018-06-08T18:27:43.620+01:002018-06-08T18:27:43.620+01:00Just sounds like a company trying to pilfer all co...Just sounds like a company trying to pilfer all companies with patent trolls. All this will do is prevent AI from progressing because someone wants to make a $. AI should be banned from patent requests imo.Protocol-Xhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08822840860987270355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-34940004495618253132018-06-08T10:58:47.833+01:002018-06-08T10:58:47.833+01:00The problem with this post and Gwilym Roberts'...The problem with this post and Gwilym Roberts's excitable post is that AI is a badly-defined term, of the kind that patent attorneys should be wary of. AI seems to encompass everything from rule-based deterministic systems, to neural networks, to AGI and artificial consciousness. The latter seems, like commercial nuclear fusion, always to be 20 or 50 years in the future.<br /><br />DeepMind's filing programme looks like a solid attempt to create a thicket of applications around uses for particular (known) types of neural networks. I am not convinced the disclosures are all enabling. It does not, to these jaded eyes, look in any way like the dawn of a new day for AI. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com