tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post7799058632933779422..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Friday fantasiesVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-76889405995716185382012-03-17T11:21:02.789+00:002012-03-17T11:21:02.789+00:00I read the Henley judgement and then your earlier ...I read the Henley judgement and then your earlier post. <br /><br />In the last para you say: "Merpel marvels that a business can take a licence from a brand owner, establish a good trading position, then decide it can do without the licence and expect to get away with it."<br /><br />But at the end of para 34 of the judgement, the judge says, "I therefore propose to consider the material facts for the purposes of the claim in passing off without regard to the previous existence of the trademark licence."<br /><br />So how relevant was the licence to the way the judgement went?S A Karthikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02941551816875440509noreply@blogger.com