tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post8046296987440500702..comments2024-03-19T12:09:41.188+00:00Comments on The IPKat: ... and now there's a third!Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-66258686875607242342007-11-07T16:17:00.000+00:002007-11-07T16:17:00.000+00:00Steve -- I didn't say "in opposition proceedings...Steve -- I didn't say "in opposition proceedings!"<BR/><BR/>There's also an argument that the conditions for opposition under art.8(4) are met by the terms of a favourably-drafted coexistence contract as well as by, e.g., prior use (and OMEGA is a non-registered sign in respect of goods and services for which it hasn't yet been registered)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-31890659457541053102007-11-07T14:07:00.000+00:002007-11-07T14:07:00.000+00:00Merpel, you can't raise "bad faith" when opposing ...Merpel, you can't raise "bad faith" when opposing a CTM application. You have to wait until the CTM is registered!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com