tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post8081682019454034394..comments2024-03-29T13:59:42.629+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Swing the axe, glue the tail, spin the coin: damages for patent infringementVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-65817355251160697632012-04-17T12:49:26.869+01:002012-04-17T12:49:26.869+01:00Just starting to look at the decisions but one (of...Just starting to look at the decisions but one (off-thread) question immediately arises in my mind: what would mainland Europe think of basing a finding of obviousness on "the Casper Memorandum"? This was not a publication but, rather, a report dictated by Mr Casper in his hotel room one evening, of a machine he had seen in a factory earlier that day.<br /><br />As English courts often tell us, findings about the validity of a claim will depend on the matrix of fact on which the decision is based. I find it hard to imagine any court on the mainland following the English court on this one. But if the parties are in dispute round and about Europe, what did the courts in other EPC States decide? Does any reader know?MaxDreinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-86477998016581984692012-04-16T17:14:31.152+01:002012-04-16T17:14:31.152+01:00On a personal note: well done Annsley :)On a personal note: well done Annsley :)Birgit Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02822674465997696890noreply@blogger.com