tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post8413979643523182627..comments2024-03-29T12:23:31.959+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Court Fees - Do you know what to pay?Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-10410582181959039042016-08-19T16:37:13.075+01:002016-08-19T16:37:13.075+01:00It's an unreported and ongoing case. At one po...It's an unreported and ongoing case. At one point Hacon did threaten to transfer the claim to the small claims track, so beware!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-80246596555606193002016-08-19T13:46:49.877+01:002016-08-19T13:46:49.877+01:00Anon @1554 which case? Also, is this slightly dif...Anon @1554 which case? Also, is this slightly different in the IPEC as they like to have quantum heard at the same time if possible.<br /><br />As a Defendant, probably worth coughing up level of infringement early so that this wheeze can be avoided.iPuffinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-40404392043611215042016-08-18T10:19:19.792+01:002016-08-18T10:19:19.792+01:00I'm not convinced whether it's worth the p...I'm not convinced whether it's worth the possibility of a judge's dim view; or even the time/hassle/submissions/cost of considering a stay until the correct fee has been paid.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-24725447600727988942016-08-17T15:54:56.254+01:002016-08-17T15:54:56.254+01:00A similar argument was made before Judge Hacon in ...A similar argument was made before Judge Hacon in a CMC earlier this year for registered design infringement in the IPEC. Hacon took a dim view and said that it was plainly a monetary claim. The Claimant was ordered to pay a court fee to reflect its best estimate of the value of the claim. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com