tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post8774116031398125780..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: The Reprobel decision: fair compensation justified by actual harm (so is it OK to have a levy-free private copying exception?)Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-36497201517166358482015-11-19T21:06:59.767+00:002015-11-19T21:06:59.767+00:00errrrrrrmmm.....do they like complication?errrrrrrmmm.....do they like complication?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-45215394600202395732015-11-13T13:54:33.435+00:002015-11-13T13:54:33.435+00:00What does " nor indirectly commercial;" ...What does "<i> nor indirectly commercial;</i>" even mean in the context of a person obtaining something FOR ANY USE when the item obtained is only "out there" by a rights holder FOR commercial reasons?<br /><br />If the ONLY reason the item is made available at all is for commercial reasons, then ALL uses (personal, traditional Fair Use, or whatever) <i><b>necessarily</b></i> are indirectly commercial (from the point of view of the rights' holder).The Pigsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-39261843563239037992015-11-13T11:20:16.218+00:002015-11-13T11:20:16.218+00:00Very interesting - I wonder where that leaves serv...Very interesting - I wonder where that leaves services like Google Music?<br /><br />Google Music Manager is a bit of software with no other purpose than to search a user's computer for music (e.g. that has been ripped from a CD they own), then upload it to Google's servers, so that it can be listened to on any device that can access the Google Music service (limited to a specific number of authorised devices, but basically any computer/phone/tablet). It is intended to make it easy to put your music collection (that you have probably already ripped to a PC) into the cloud.<br /><br />To what extent is this merely reproduction for private use? Does it cause "harm to the author"?<br /><br />Would be interested in your views.Davenoreply@blogger.com