tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post8844953405661397739..comments2024-03-18T17:10:35.838+00:00Comments on The IPKat: The BGH, Pippi Longstocking and a fancy dressVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-90314807498814418282013-08-28T08:15:15.700+01:002013-08-28T08:15:15.700+01:00Well, while the advertisment may have shown "...Well, while the advertisment may have shown "Pippi" (i.e. a Girl/woman having red pigtails, freckles and a potato-shaped nose wearing the typical Pippi Dress, they apparently only sold the dress, but not the girl/woman that looks like Pippi AND wears the typical dress.<br /><br />Maybe the court therefore came to the conclusion that only some external characteristics were embodied in the present case. <br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com