tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post8898095365238886914..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Never-Reddy? Roth rules reference "non-propitious"Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-54088961507085921182012-07-19T02:33:07.556+01:002012-07-19T02:33:07.556+01:00I just imagine a Court case at the European Court ...I just imagine a Court case at the European Court of Justice about the unitary patent court where the patent community tells the judges that they think they are incompetent to deal with patents and that stand-alone patent courts with "technical judges" (=not qualified as a judge) are the way forward.Tabesinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13242661057308840634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-3731770525570161702012-07-17T16:46:24.375+01:002012-07-17T16:46:24.375+01:00Forum shopping does happen re references to the CJ...Forum shopping does happen re references to the CJEU. Eurotunnel failed in an attempt to bring a JR on transitional arrangements for the ending of intra-EU duty free in England in R. v Customs and Excise Commissioners Ex p. Eurotunnel Plc Divisional Court, 17 February 1995 [1995] C.L.C. 392; [1995] C.O.D. 291, but succeeded in getting the issue referred in November 1995 by the Tribunal de commerce de Paris in Case C-408/95 Eurotunnel SA and Others v SeaFrance [1997] ECR I-6315.Aidan Robertson QChttp://www.brickcourt.co.uknoreply@blogger.com