Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

Back-to-school season has returned, bringing fresh notebooks, growing shopping lists and, perhaps, less time for IP news. This Kat, meanwhile, admired the aesthetic on Pinterest while catching up on the summer goals she had expertly procrastinated. Here is what you may have missed.
"What's school?"

Copyright

Katfriend Alberto Godioli examined what the ODEE–Samherji dispute and its missed Strasbourg chapter revealed about culture jamming, parody and the uneasy balance between copyright and freedom of expression.

Patents and Plant Variety Rights

Claire Gregg analysed an Australian Patent Office decision in which unclear agreements and evidentiary gaps left a patent entitlement claim on shaky ground.

Jocelyn Bosse explored the UK’s negotiations for possible unitary plant variety protection with the EU and the legal questions stirred by this potential post-Brexit reunion.

Trade marks

Marcel Pemsel analysed how Angry Birds crashed into a bad-faith dispute before the EUIPO’s Board of Appeal and considered what the decision suggested about the relationship between reputation, free-riding and bad faith.



Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Wissam Bentazar on Wednesday, September 02, 2026 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.