tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post1020945692520164851..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: STOP PRESS: New Directive replaces 89/104Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-20598731308718099372008-11-12T13:54:00.000+00:002008-11-12T13:54:00.000+00:00It's strictly a codification of existing texts (th...It's strictly a codification of existing texts (the initial directive and it's later amendments). There is no substantive change in the new text.<BR/><BR/>Apparently the Internal Market directorate of the Commission had nothing better to do. There are a couple of other IP texts which have been codified as well or are about to be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-85563232946221669222008-11-10T23:19:00.000+00:002008-11-10T23:19:00.000+00:00I think that, to resolve the "not similar" issue, ...I think that, to resolve the "not similar" issue, the process would have had to be a truly legislative one rather than a mechanical consolidation/codification exercise. Once that happens, all the other bits of the Directive are presumably up for grabs too.Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-69370353605577649792008-11-10T22:01:00.000+00:002008-11-10T22:01:00.000+00:00I noticed that in relation to dilution infringemen...I noticed that in relation to dilution infringement "not similar" remains (in other words, the Directive does not take account of Adidas v Fitnessworld). One wonders why this could not have be resolved.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-58697879213399895752008-11-10T10:43:00.000+00:002008-11-10T10:43:00.000+00:00So what (if any) significant changes are there bet...So what (if any) significant changes are there between the old directive and the new one?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com