tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post1195610393859703273..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: In all events, we need a diaryVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-34124248417580609352011-11-23T16:53:14.207+00:002011-11-23T16:53:14.207+00:00Since the IPKat already has a Google account, it s...Since the IPKat already has a Google account, it should be a simple matter to use the Google Calender associated with the account, and to make it publicly available for all to view. All it will need is for someone to keep it updated - not something that would be too onerous, and it looks like you already have a volunteer.David Pearcehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02336561458060095886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-21207668362360885392011-11-23T14:28:12.770+00:002011-11-23T14:28:12.770+00:00An additional item of date would be useful: eligib...An additional item of date would be useful: eligibility. For example one or two events advertised in IPKAT's upcoming events diary have been marketing events for various barristers' chambers and I (as a competing barrister) have been told I'm not welcome. That's fair enough - no point marketing to me after all - but I think its something that should be clearly and honestly declared, otherwise one wastes time planning around things and then much later discovers they are out of reach.Francis Daveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10228026893626221724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-11871001193034637622011-11-23T14:00:05.360+00:002011-11-23T14:00:05.360+00:00If a simple technical solution like a Google Calen...If a simple technical solution like a Google Calendar would suffice - which might, possibly, be associated with the IPKat readers Google group, though I can't see quite how this might be done at present, I would be happy to receive information about events and put it into the calendar. If it's more complicated than that, I might have to think again!Peter Grovesnoreply@blogger.com