tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post2117133662487161932..comments2024-03-29T06:00:27.896+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a mapVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-68304955830875125692016-02-12T18:02:12.254+00:002016-02-12T18:02:12.254+00:00Thanks so much for your kind words and helpful fee...Thanks so much for your kind words and helpful feedback, Ash! This is indeed something to add. Thanks again and enjoy your weekend!Eleonora Rosatihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-51013025558350855892016-02-12T15:43:01.033+00:002016-02-12T15:43:01.033+00:00Thank you for your wonderful trade mark post, Elea...Thank you for your wonderful trade mark post, Eleanor - your map is a great tool.! <br /><br />One suggestion that I thought might be useful is perhaps to add a small, extra part at the end of the map dealing briefly with renewal/right to renew. But more specifically dealing with (or signposting) the potential revival of a lapsed registration or potential for (severely) late renewal. (Alternatively the renewal piece could also connect to the lower box at the end - “10 years (renewable as long as registration requirements subsist)”. <br /><br />Admittedly this might seem a somewhat dull procedural step that does not merit inclusion on your table - but equally - I thought it could be applicable and of interest both to those who have failed to renew, and also to those who are wishing to file but have noticed a lapsed mark (which could still be potentially be revived if within the applicable time limits) and which is possibly blocking a potentially successful application. <br /><br />This would therefore seem to be relevant to both ends of your map. <br /><br />Anyway - just a thought/suggestion.Ash von Schwannoreply@blogger.com