tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post2416144082166874638..comments2024-03-28T13:45:42.289+00:00Comments on The IPKat: MAPPING Europe's future: a Roman convocationVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-59790996137698906132014-05-20T12:12:39.930+01:002014-05-20T12:12:39.930+01:00Andy J -- if I thought there was a chance that any...Andy J -- if I thought there was a chance that anyone might speak out of turn and say something not sanctioned by their affiliation, I would have heartily agreed with you. In any event, when people do take a position that is contrary to their organisation, it is the fact that they have said it, rather than someone else, that is worth reporting!Jeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01123244020588707776noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-66761743808732971802014-05-20T10:25:38.134+01:002014-05-20T10:25:38.134+01:00Jeremy, Surely one of the 'advantages' of ...Jeremy, Surely one of the 'advantages' of the Chatham House Rule is that, contrary to your proposition that the delegates "are either repeating the positions of their employers or saying things that they have already published in print or on the internet", under the Rule, they can in fact take a position which is not that of their employer or any previous public utterances. <br />Unlikely I know, but useful for a devil's advocate (as opposed to devilish advocates). Andy Jnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-35222870730693856512014-05-20T09:10:39.075+01:002014-05-20T09:10:39.075+01:00Thank goodness you did not take that Casa dell'...Thank goodness you did not take that Casa dell'Aviatore pic this morning :-) #chathamEleonora Rosatihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05629420303968805446noreply@blogger.com