tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post2969611176681430782..comments2024-03-28T13:45:42.289+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Hot roast chickens and Aspergic skilled menVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-61768506204055958702008-06-16T10:39:00.000+01:002008-06-16T10:39:00.000+01:00I'm not sure that the C-IV 11.8 is particularly re...I'm not sure that the C-IV 11.8 is particularly relevant here. <BR/><BR/>Did the Defendants really try to combine multiple documents? I interpreted Mr Prescott's point as being more along the lines that it's not a good idea to say that the invention is obvious over say D1 (your main argument) and then say its also obvious over say D2 or D3 or D4. <BR/><BR/>Eventually you get to the point where you are providing so much prior art, none of which are a novelty depriving, that it suggests that "the invention is not so obvious after all" (numerous others have worked around the subject matter without any of them working the invention).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com