tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post3394080127111794809..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Friday fantasiesVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-45631134727520038352014-03-14T13:44:45.814+00:002014-03-14T13:44:45.814+00:00Anonymous of 12.32:
While it is true that Jeremy ...Anonymous of 12.32:<br /><br />While it is true that Jeremy may not be the "person most likely to be the second coming", he may still be a candidate. His Facebook entry gives his date of birth as 25 December 1951.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-37827177785521308522014-03-14T12:32:11.701+00:002014-03-14T12:32:11.701+00:00to 1st response of my comment: I can't see how...to 1st response of my comment: I can't see how my comment could be construed in a way which reads that I don't believe readers of this blog can't make up their own minds. In fact, I'm sure I praise their intelligence rather than criticise it.<br /><br />to 2nd response: Whilst I am highly respectful of his views and his contribution to IP, I must admit that I have not put Jeremy on the list of nominations for "person most likely to be the second coming" such that I didn't expect people to cancel their Friday night down the boozer at his whim.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-73585064027134270812014-03-14T12:08:23.343+00:002014-03-14T12:08:23.343+00:00To anonymous of 10:46 - anyone with the IQ of even...To anonymous of 10:46 - anyone with the IQ of even half a chipmunk, or indeed with half the brains of a whole chipmunk - and who was a regular reader of this blog would instantly know that the bit that reads "This Kat, who has not seen the film, is curious to know what readers of this weblog think of it" actually means "This Kat isn't going to be watching it and suggests that his pro-IP friends turn up in quantity to try to give the positive side of IP an airing in the face of the sort of anti-IP message that this film would appear to be sending out".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-11652136216107930212014-03-14T11:48:28.248+00:002014-03-14T11:48:28.248+00:00In response to Anonymous of 10:46, the readers of ...In response to Anonymous of 10:46, the readers of this blog are capable of making up their own minds on the issue. The film is an insight into the difficult debate on pharma v those who can't afford medicines. This is a controversial area, but all parties do deserve to be heard. The film is well made and I think presents its case well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-52054321877547535412014-03-14T10:46:34.089+00:002014-03-14T10:46:34.089+00:00I'd have thought readers of this blog had an I...I'd have thought readers of this blog had an IQ greater than that of a chipmunk and would therefore not waste their time on such a film.<br /><br />Can anyone remind me how many new medicines Cipla, for example, have discovered? I don't have any fingers on my hand, but it is probably enough to count with.<br /><br />I don't remember any global ban on individuals or rich nations paying a fair-market price for the drugs so that they can be gifted to the poor, or any ban on the South African government publishing truthful information on AIDS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com